We hope your break was rewarding and relaxing, and before we get onto our next topic of White Noise and Consumerism, this is a space for you to post any thoughts, questions or comments you may have regarding Baudrillard and
The Matrix.
If you're interested in Baudrillard, you might want to read up on Guy Debord, an important predecessor. Debord's most famous text was The Society of the Spectacle, which begins:
"In societies dominated by modern conditions of production, life is presented as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has receded into a representation."
That's back in 1967. Not hard to see the influence on Baudrillard's later theories of simulation.
And now for the news.
Michael Jackson is in discussions about creating a 50-foot robotic replica of himself to roam the Las Vegas desert, according to reports.
The pop legend is currently understood to be living in the city, as he considers making a comeback after 2004's turbulent child sex case.
It has now been claimed that his plans include an elaborate show in Vegas, which would feature the giant Jacko striding around the desert, firing laser beams.
If built, the metal monster would apparently be visible to aircraft as they come in to land in the casino capital.
It is the centre-piece of an elaborate Jackson-inspired show in Vegas, according to Andre Van Pier, the robot's designer.
Luckman Van Pier, his partner at the company behind the proposal, claims blueprints have been drawn-up for the show and seen by the star.
"Michael's looked at the sketches and likes them", he told the New York Daily News.
On the subject of the robot, he continued: "It would be in the desert sands. Laser beams would shoot out of it so it would be the first thing people flying in would see."
But is this an attempt to recover the 'real', in opposition to the excessive artifice of contemporary filmmaking technology? It's quite different to the
Dogme movement, however, which attempts to do away with all unnecessary elements in the making of a film - lighting, soundtrack, script etc. Can one kind of film be more 'real' than another, or would Baudrillard argue that this is the wrong question to ask?